On Base Station Coordination in Cache- and Energy Harvesting-Enabled HetNets: A Stochastic Geometry Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the performance of base station (BS) coordination in heterogeneous networks (HetNets) with cache-enabled and renewable energy-powered small cell BSs (SBSs). Macrocell base stations (MBSs) provide basic coverage, while the SBSs, powered by harvested energy, conduct content-aware coordinated transmission to provide high data rate and further improve the network coverage. Specifically, a joint transmission strategy is performed based on the knowledge of the energy states and the cached contents of SBSs, along with the awareness of the availability of channel resources and the average received signal strength (RSS) of the corresponding link. Stochastic geometry is applied to characterize the statistics of the cell load at MBSs and SBSs, as well as the aggregated information and interference signal strength. Then, the average user capacity for the joint transmission is obtained. Additionally, the coverage probability is derived with gamma approximation for the aggregated information and interference signal strength. Analytical results reveal that the average user capacity and coverage probability can be maximized with optimal cache size, energy harvesting rate and cooperative RSS threshold. Finally, extensive numerical and simulation results are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".