MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780430788

Update richtlijn psoriasis 2017

2017· article· nl· W2780430788 on OpenAlexaff
G. E. van der Kraaij, Phyllis I. Spuls, Deepak M.W. Balak, Celine Busard, Yoo-Ri Chung, O.D. van Cranenburgh, R.J.B. Driessen, J.J.E. van Everdingen, F. van Gaalen, M. de Groot, J. H. F. Hulshuizen, E.M.G.J. de Jong, P. M. J. H. Kemperman, Wim J A de Kort, I. Laffra, L.L.A. Lecluse, P.P.M. van Lümig, S.P. Menting, Errol P. Prens, J.M.P.A. van den Reek, Marieke M.B. Seyger, H. Bing Thio, Wendelien Veldkamp, Marlies Wakkee

Bibliographic record

VenueEUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriasisMedicineDermatology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The update of the NVDV guideline psoriasis 2017 is summarized. In the update the chapters methotrexate, fumaric acid esters, biologics, children, serum concentrations and antibody formation and quality of life are renewed. In addition chapters on secukinumab, apremilast, choice of treatment, combination treatment, psoriatic arthritis and pregnancy and breastfeeding during biologic treatment have been added. The update is based on the NVDV guideline psoriasis 20111, European Dermatology Forum (EDF) guideline Psoriasis 20152 and new search and analyses by the workgroup. The most important differences in the update 2017 compared to the NVDV guideline psoriasis 2011 are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam)Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207