MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780576288 · doi:10.14841/jspp.2011.0.s0049.0

1KP: an international consortium sequencing the transcriptomes of 1000 phylogenetically diverse plants from angiosperms to green algae

2011· article· ja· W2780576288 on OpenAlexaff
Wong Gane Ka-Shu

Bibliographic record

Venue日本植物生理学会年会およびシンポジウム 講演要旨集 第52回日本植物生理学会年会要旨集 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrio choleraeBiologyOutbreakEcologyNicheCholeraAlgaeEcological nicheWaterborne diseasesMicrobiologyBacteriaWater qualityVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of the severe life-threatening diarrheal disease “cholera”, naturally inhabits aquatic environments. It is a waterborne pathogen, which infects human hosts ingesting contaminated water. Despite intensive research in characterizing V. cholerae’s physiology and mode of infection in the laboratory and in animal model systems, we still have a very limited understanding of the ecological niche it occupies in its coastal aquatic environmental reservoir. This is even more limited for Vibrio metecus, the newly discovered close relative of V. cholerae. The knowledge obtained from this study will help us to determine the environmental factors that affect the prevalence of these two species. Identifying and understanding V. cholerae’s niche in the natural environment and its interaction with other species is critical in managing and predicting outbreaks of this lethal disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue日本植物生理学会年会およびシンポジウム 講演要旨集 第52回日本植物生理学会年会要旨集Same topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207