MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780747774 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v7n1p125

M/M/1 Model with Unreliable Service

2017· article· en· W2780747774 on OpenAlex
Andrzej Korzeniowski Joshua Patterson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMarkov chainStationary distributionQueueing theoryApplied mathematicsQueueBulk queueBurke's theoremLaplace transformLaplace–Stieltjes transformMathematical optimizationGenerating functionConstruct (python library)Computer scienceDiscrete mathematicsFork–join queueStatisticsQueue management systemMathematical analysisComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We define a new term ”unreliable service” and construct the corresponding embedded Markov Chain to an M/M/1 queue with so defined protocol. Sufficient conditions for positive recurrence and closed form of stationary distribution are provided. Furthermore, we compute the probability generating function of the stationary queue length and Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the stationary waiting time. In the course of the analysis an interesting decomposition of both the queue length and waiting time has emerged. A number of queueing models can be recovered from our work by taking limits of certain parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it