Nourishing Relations: Controversy over the Conga Mining Project in Northern Peru
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article extends debates on ontological multiplicity and considers the potential and limitations of this analytical lens for understanding the dynamics of mining activity in Cajamarca, Peru. Peasant farmers from El Tambo organised themselves to protect the lagoons in the Conga project area. We examine different conceptions of ‘nourishment’ to understand people’s relationship with land and water, and the company’s environmental management plans, including a proposal to replace the lagoons with artificial reservoirs. Competing ‘designs on the land’ reveal complex relations among humans and elements of the environment, which are re-created and transformed in situations of conflict. Ethnographic attention to designs on the land elucidates the processes through which ontologies or ‘worlds’ are made. We emphasise the connection between past practices and recent events, recognising people’s long-standing relationships and commitments to the land without ignoring the political creativity that made the lagoons into a source of life to be defended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it