Sex Hormones Regulate Rat Hepatic Monocarboxylate Transporter Expression and Membrane Trafficking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) are involved in the transport of monocarboxylates such as ketone bodies, lactate, and pharmaceutical agents. CD147 functions as an ancillary protein for MCT1 and MCT4 for plasma membrane trafficking. Sex differences in MCT1 and MCT4 have been observed in muscle and reproductive tissues; however, there is a paucity of information on MCT sex differences in tissues involved in drug disposition. The objective of the present study was to quantify hepatic MCT1, MCT4 and CD147 mRNA, total cellular and membrane protein expression in males, over the estrous cycle in females and in ovariectomized (OVX) females. METHOD: Liver samples were collected from females at the four estrous cycle stages (proestrus, estrus, metestrus, diestrus), OVX females and male Sprague-Dawley rats (N = 3 - 5). Estrus cycle stage of females was determined by vaginal lavage. mRNA and protein (total and membrane) expression of MCT1, MCT4 and CD147 was evaluated by qPCR and western blot analysis. RESULTS: MCT1 mRNA and membrane protein expression varied with estrous cycle stage, with OVX females having higher expression than males, indicating that female sex hormones may play a role in MCT1 regulation. MCT4 membrane expression varied with estrous cycle stage with expression significantly lower than males. MCT4 membrane expression in OVX females was also lower than males, suggesting that androgens play a role in membrane expression of MCT4. Males had higher membrane CD147 expression, whereas there was no difference in whole cell protein and mRNA levels suggesting that androgens are involved in regulating CD147 membrane localization. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates hepatic expression and membrane localization of MCT1, MCT4 and CD147 are regulated by sex hormones. Sex differences in hepatic MCT expression may lead to altered drug disposition, so it is critical to elucidate the underlying mechanisms in the sex hormone-dependent regulation of MCT expression. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".