Tetrahedral, Octahedral, and Triangular Dipyramidal Microgel Clusters with Thermosensitivity Fabricated from Binary Colloidal Crystals Template and Thiol–Ene Reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A template-based strategy to fabricate soft colloidal clusters with distinct symmetries of tetrahedra, octahedra, and triangular dipyramid is described. We use binary microgel colloidal crystals as a template, in which the large microgels with surface thiol groups are arranged into a close-packed lattice and a few small microgels with surface vinyl groups occupy the tetrahedral or octahedral interstitial sites, and then immobilize the structure via in situ thiol–ene reaction under UV irradiation. Both 2D cross sections and reconstructed 3D morphology of these clusters are clearly characterized by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The formation mechanism of microgel clusters is discussed, which is closely related to the microgel soft properties, size ratio, and colloidal crystal packing structure. The resulting clusters inherit the thermosensitivity and defects tolerance of poly( N -isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) microgel, which would facilitate their self-assembly into more complex structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".