MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781013560 · doi:10.25336/p6391d

Stationary population, immigration, social cohesion, and national identity: What are the links and the policy implications? With special attention to Canada: A demographer’s point of view

2017· article· en· W2781013560 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Anatole Romaniuk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Studies in Population · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPopulationCohesion (chemistry)Identity (music)SociologyMulticulturalismNational identityHumanitiesEthnologyPolitical scienceDemographyArtLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, this author has devoted some of his research to the question of stationary population as a policy vision for Canada and beyond. The focus was largely economics and ecology. The virtue of the stationary population, it was argued, is that it cut across ecologists’ long-term concerns and economists’ short-term concerns. The present paper, while reiterating some of the same economic arguments, addresses stationary population as a policy option from the point of view of national identity and social cohesion. To this end, it explores the policy and ideological dimensions of multiculturalism in Canada. It also examines immigration trends in Canada and Western Europe, and makes some incursions into the history of how cosmopolitan states have fared. The paper’s conclusion is that stationary population is optimal in terms of national identity and social cohesion. Ces dernières années, l’auteur a consacré certaines de ses recherches à la question de la population stationnaire au Canada et ailleurs dans le monde. L’optique en a été économique et écologique. La vertu de la population stationnaire, il a été soutenu, réside dans le fait qu’elle réponde aux préoccupations tant à long terme des écologistes qu’à court terme des économistes. Tout en réitérant ces préoccupations, la présente étude examine les attributs de la population stationnaires du point de vue de l’identité nationale et de la cohésion sociale. Dans ce but, l’étude explore les dimensions du multiculturalisme au Canada. Sont également examinés les courants migratoires au Canada et dans les pays occidentaux, tout en faisant des incursions dans l’histoire des sociétés cosmopolites, leurs réussites et leurs échecs. La conclusion de la présente étude est que la population stationnaire est optimale des points de vue de l’identité nationale et de la cohésion sociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.019
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Studies in PopulationSame topicPost-Communist Economic and Political TransitionFrench-language works237,207