MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781050762 · doi:10.3828/qs.2017.16

De l’univers imaginaire à la typographie: discours sur la création dans <i>Wigrum</i> de Daniel Canty

2017· article· fr· W2781050762 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsty Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueQuebec Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypefaceHumanitiesArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wigrum de Daniel Canty présente une facture graphique inédite qui participe au monde littéraire que l’auteur développe. Une nouvelle typographie créée pour le livre ainsi que les nombreux différents types de mise en page (listes, récits, index, pages titres, intertitres, notes explicatives, dessins, etc.) créent des effets d’hybridité visuelle et exposent les opérations à l’œuvre dans la construction du récit et du livre. Cet article examine les façons dont les effets graphiques du roman deviennent des effets littéraires. Il s’agit précisément de cerner la manière dont le graphisme contribue aux métadiscours sur des principes de création littéraire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuebec StudiesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207