L’écoute créative de Cornelius Castoriadis. Pour une métapsychologie de l’imagination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les théories en sciences humaines et sociales sur l’imagination méconnaissent l’inconscient et la psychanalyse n’a jamais fait de l’imagination une catégorie métapsychologique. Le débat n’a donc pas eu lieu sur une notion pourtant fondamentale. Castoriadis a ouvert une brèche en donnant à l’imagination une place essentielle dans les processus de création sans toutefois lui conférer un statut scientifique. Nous souhaiterions donc, à la suite de Castoriadis, militer pour une entrée en scène de l’imagination dans une métapsychologie contemporaine élargie : en quoi cette notion est-elle nécessaire ? Qu’apporte-t-elle à une écoute renouvelée de la vie psychique ? Son invention nous permet-elle vraiment de découvrir de nouvelles Amériques du monde fantasmatique ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".