Quantification of the Relationship Between Sea Surface Roughness and the Size of the Glistening Zone for GNSS-R
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A formulation of the relationship between sea-surface roughness and extension of the glistening zone (GZ) of a Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) system is presented. First, an analytical expression of the link between GZ area, viewing geometry, and surface mean square slope (MSS) is derived. Then, a strategy for retrieval of surface roughness from the delay-Doppler map (DDM) is illustrated, including details of data preprocessing, quality control, and GZ area estimation from the DDM. Next, an example for application of the proposed approach to spaceborne GNSS-R remote sensing is provided, using DDMs from the TechDemoSat-1 mission. The algorithm is first calibrated using collocated in situ roughness estimates using data sets from the National Data Buoy Center, its retrieval performance is then assessed, and some of the limitations of the suggested technique are discussed. Overall, good correlation is found between buoy-derived MSS and estimates obtained using the proposed strategy ($r=0.73$ ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".