MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781273380

Koplopers in disability management : onderzoeksverslag in het kader van het project "succesfactoren voor disability management" in opdracht van het ministerie van SZW

2000· article· nl· W2781273380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F.A. Reijenga, H. Bosselaar

Bibliographic record

VenueTNO Repository · 2000
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesManagementArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disability management, een managementinstrument ontwikkeld in de VS en Canada, is erop gericht om arbeidsgehandicapte werknemers zo goed mogelijk in te zetten in het arbeidsproces, daarbij rekening houdend met hun functionele beperkingen. In dit rapport worden de ervaringen van 28 Nederlandse bedrijven met disability management beschreven. Het gaat hierbij om bedrijven die gelden als koploper op het terrein van de reïntegratie van arbeidsgehandicapten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTNO RepositorySame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207