MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781331865 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2017-0180

Laboratory investigation of pore pressure dissipation in clay around permeable piles

2017· article· en· W2781331865 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pengpeng Ni, Sujith Mangalathu, Guoxiong Mei, Yanlin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPore water pressureConsolidation (business)Geotechnical engineeringPileDissipationDrainageGeologySettlement (finance)Foundation (evidence)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excess pore-water pressures induced by pile driving could have a detrimental effect on a project, especially on the construction sequence and ground settlement. Measures that can effectively accelerate dissipation of pore pressures are therefore valuable. One way to reduce the pore pressure is the use of permeable piles. This paper presents a series of model-scale laboratory tests conducted on piles with drainage holes around the pile circumference. It is found that permeable piles could accelerate soil consolidation significantly, and the beneficial effects are more apparent for group pile tests. An approximate influencing zone of permeable piles was derived in this study based on the experimental observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207