Les imaginaires du numérique : ambiguïté, pouvoir et la question de l’agentivité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution s’intéresse à la fois aux dimensions de l’environnement numérique accordant du pouvoir et à celles limitant la capacité d’agir de l’agentivité individuelle et collective à façonner l’environnement médiatisé. La plupart du temps, la vie médiée par les technologies numériques diminue la capacité d’agir (disempowering) des citoyennes et citoyens en raison des asymétries de pouvoir attribuables au capitalisme global. Il serait cependant erroné de suggérer que la communication numériquement médiatisée les exploite toujours. En effet, les dynamiques de pouvoir dans le régime de gouvernance numérique en vigueur demeurent à comprendre. L’analyse de ces dynamiques suggère souvent que la participation en ligne coïncide avec une détérioration des choix offerts aux citoyennes et citoyens, mais des dynamiques contradictoires peuvent néanmoins donner lieu à des possibilités de prise de pouvoir, d’autonomisation et de choix des citoyennes et citoyens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".