MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781441426 · doi:10.2533/chimia.2017.872

SWISS SYMPOSIUM in Point-of-Care Diagnostics at HES-SO Valais

2017· article· en· W2781441426 on OpenAlexaff
Elsbeth Heinzelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicQuality and Safety in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint of carePharmacyPoint (geometry)BusinessKey (lock)MedicineNursingComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When an innovative technology is going to be implemented in hospitals, medical practices or pharmacies, it often does not appear really new to researchers. It is the implementation itself and the domain where it is used that are at the core of innovation. That's why the SWISS SYMPOSIUM in Point-of-Care Diagnostics (POCD) brings together key stakeholders from research and industry to clinical settings and patient care to exchange knowledge and experience and to stimulate activities in POCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHIMIA International Journal for ChemistrySame topicQuality and Safety in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207