MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781457135 · doi:10.1142/s021833901740006x

BISTABILITY ANALYSIS OF AN HIV MODEL WITH IMMUNE RESPONSE

2017· article· en· W2781457135 on OpenAlex
Shaoli Wang, Fei Xu, Libin Rong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersDivision of Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsImmune systemViral loadBistabilityVirusHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Steady state (chemistry)ImmunologyBiologyVirologyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some HIV-infected patients (the so-called post-treatment controllers) can control the virus after cessation of antiretroviral therapy. A small fraction of patients can even naturally maintain undetectable viral load without therapy (they are called elite controllers). The immune response may play an important role in viral control in these patients. In this paper, we analyze a within-host model including immune response to study the virus dynamics in HIV-infected patients. We derived two threshold values for the immune cell proliferation parameter. Below the lower immune proliferation rate, the model has a stable immune-free steady state, which predicts that patients have a high viral load. Above the higher immune proliferation rate, the model has a stable low infected steady state, which indicates that patients are under elite control. Between the two immune thresholds, the model exhibits the dynamic behavior of bistability, which suggests that patients either undergo viral rebound after treatment termination or achieve the post-treatment control. These results may explain the different virus dynamics in HIV-infected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it