MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781558459 · doi:10.5430/crim.v5n1p18

Atypical Sjögren presentation of pruriginous rash and mild eosinophilia with minor sicca symptoms: A case report

2018· article· en· W2781558459 on OpenAlexaff
Noemie Tremblay, Alexandra E Bourque, Jean-Pascal Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Internal Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyRashEosinophiliaHydroxychloroquineSicca syndromeBiopsyPopulationPathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of an 82-year-old woman diagnosed with Sjögren syndrome on the basis of salivary gland biopsy and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies who presented to our institution with a pruriginous maculopapular pancorporeal rash with diffuse eosinophilic infiltrate and mild eosinophilia. Sicca symptoms were mild. Cutaneous and hematologic findings resolved spontaneously within 4 weeks, the rash did not respond to antihistamines but was mildly attenuated by topical corticosteroid. Both the rash and hypereosinophilia greatly improved while the patient received oral corticosteroids for a contrast medium allergy before a CT-scan. When the patient was diagnosed with SS, hydroxychloroquine treatment was introduced. This case report aims to raise awareness of the possibility of such a clinical presentation, considering the known increased risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma associated with Sjögren syndrome estimated to 5%-10% lifetime risk which is 5 to 44 times higher than that of the general population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in Internal MedicineSame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207