A new look at the geological framework of the central Noranda camp, Quebec from industry high-resolution seismic profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of the Targeted Geoscience Initiative, the Geological Survey of Canada obtained access to industry-owned seismic-reflection data along two profiles crossing the volcanic rocks of the Noranda mining camp. A detailed 3-D geological model covering the central Noranda camp was also provided to the TGI-3 Abitibi Project by Xstrata Copper Canada. The model is primarily based on exploration drill cores and allows precise comparison between seismic reflections and subsurface geology. The Amulet seismic section reveals several prominent east-dipping reflections originating from the Flavrian pluton. The diorite mapped within the Flavrian pluton could explain the strong reflections. The volcanic rocks of the Noranda Formation are characterized by short, crossing reflections with different dips that complicate reconciliation with the faulted rhyolitic-andesitic sequences in the area. The integration of seismic data and 3-D geological model provides new constraints on the deep geological framework that may help exploration in the Noranda camp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".