MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reversal of peanut anaphylaxis by retinoic acid-differentiated dendritic cell immunotherapy. IL-27-dependent induction of Foxp3- non-Tr1 regulatory T cells (VAC4P.1100)

2015· article· en· W2781693641 on OpenAlexaff
John Gordon, Chunyan Li, Laura Churchman, Wojciech Dawicki

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXP3ImmunologyIL-2 receptorEosinophilImmunotherapyAllergic inflammationRegulatory T cellAllergyBiologyMedicineT cellImmune systemAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background. Semi-mature IL-10-induced DC (DC10) induce human or mouse effector Th2 cells (Teff) to differentiate into Foxp3+ Treg and thereby induce asthma tolerance. Retinoic acid (RA) and TGFβ-induced gut DC similarly induce tolerance to gut contents via Foxp3+ Treg, while immature hDC-10 induce IL-10-dependent Foxp3- Tr1 cells. Methods. We assessed the abilities of mature RA-induced DC to reverse anaphylaxis sensitivity, characterizing LPS-matured DC-RA and their tolerogenic activities in mouse models of OVA and peanut systemic anaphylaxis. Results. Mature DC-RA strongly expressed CD103 (αE integrin), MHCII, co-stimulatory markers, PDL1 & -L2, ICOSL, TGFβ, IL-27 and the RA-metabolizing enzyme Aldh1A2. They induced Th2 cells to convert into CD25+LAG3+CD49b-IL-10-Foxp3- Treg in an IL-10-independent, IL-27-dependent fashion, although IL-27 was dispensable for Th2 suppression by DC-RA. Wild-type, but not IL-27-/- DC-RA therapy reversed systemic anaphylaxis, including clinical scores, diarrhea, mast cell activation and Th2 responses, and lowered serum allergen-specific IgE and IgG1 levels. Conclusions. Allergen-presenting DC-RA induce food allergen tolerance by activating CD25+Foxp3-, non-Tr1 responses in an IL-27-dependent fashion. This data indicates that, like DC10, DC-RA can also be used for allergic disease immunotherapy, but that these two populations of DCreg induce distinct Treg responses, and this potentially provides us with important options DCreg immunotherapy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research→French-language works237,207→