MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781736197

High capacity battery pods and UPSs for long term deployments

2017· article· en· W2781736197 on OpenAlexaff
Scott L. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueOCEANS 2017 – Anchorage · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsOceanWorks International (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaBattery (electricity)ArcticTerm (time)ShoreMarine engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental sciencePower (physics)Oceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With harsh Arctic conditions prohibiting easy, year-round access to subsea assets due to surface ice and weather conditions comes the need to create subsea monitoring technologies capable of reliably surviving long term deployments with little or no intervention. High capacity battery pods and UPSs provide an ideal power delivery method for subsea systems when surface ice and inclement weather precludes the use of buoys or other surface based options. To provide continuous monitoring of subsea conditions throughout the seasons where access is limited, a high capacity battery pod or UPS can be used as the base of a moored array. The battery pod or UPS would act as the primary source when the site is inaccessible, allowing the continued polling and control of a variety of systems and sensors throughout the year. Logged data can then be relayed to a shore station or other common data management point. This paper focuses on high capacity battery pod and UPS applications specific to an Arctic environment where long term monitoring can be enhanced with the use of an in-situ energy reservoir. In addition, example systems and applications are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCEANS 2017 – AnchorageSame topicElectrical Fault Detection and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207