MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781791134 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b08708

Role of Hydrogen in High-Yield Growth of Boron Nitride Nanotubes at Atmospheric Pressure by Induction Thermal Plasma

2018· article· en· W2781791134 on OpenAlexafffund
Keun Su Kim, Martin Couillard, Homin Shin, Mark Plunkett, D. E. Jain Ruth, Christopher T. Kingston, Benoît Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceHydrogenBoron nitrideRadicalDissociation (chemistry)Chemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical physicsNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We recently demonstrated scalable manufacturing of boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) directly from hexagonal BN (hBN) powder by using induction thermal plasma, with a high-yield rate approaching 20 g/h. The main finding was that the presence of hydrogen is crucial for the high-yield growth of BNNTs. Here we investigate the detailed role of hydrogen by numerical modeling and in situ optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and reveal that both the thermofluidic fields and chemical pathways are significantly altered by hydrogen in favor of rapid growth of BNNTs. The numerical simulation indicated improved particle heating and quenching rates (∼10 5 K/s) due to the high thermal conductivity of hydrogen over the temperature range of 3500–4000 K. These are crucial for the complete vaporization of the hBN feedstock and rapid formation of nanosized B droplets for the subsequent BNNT growth. Hydrogen is also found to extend the active BNNT growth zone toward the reactor downstream, maintaining the gas temperature above the B solidification limit (∼2300 K) by releasing the recombination heat of H atoms, which starts at 3800 K. The OES study revealed that H radicals also stabilize B or N radicals from dissociation of the feedstock as BH and NH radicals while suppressing the formation of N 2 or N 2 + species. Our density functional theory calculations showed that such radicals can provide faster chemical pathways for the formation of BN compared with relatively inert N 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207