Reinventing Buddhism : conversations and encounters in modern India, 1839 - 1956
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation offers a fresh perspective on what has long been called India’s modern Buddhist revival. Theories of this revival are based on the idea that Buddhism, a religion founded in India more than two and a half millennium ago, disappeared between the thirteenth to fourteenth centuries and was reborn in 1956 when the Indian constitutionalist Dr. B.R. Ambedkar converted to Buddhism along with half a million of his Dalit (former ‘untouchable’) followers. This, however, is only part of the story. Taking on the conventional narrative, the study assesses how much was really known about Buddhism in the centuries after its disappearance and asks what sense we can make of the important place that Buddhism came to hold in modern Indian society. Through an extensive examination of disparate materials held at archives and temples across India and South Asia, the study demonstrates the integral role Buddhism played in India in the century prior to Ambedkar’s conversion. To frame the discussion, each chapter of the dissertation highlights an important facet of the dynamic interplay between British colonialism, global circuits of knowledge and local Indian agency. The first four chapters (c. 1830s – 1910) examine the discovery of Buddhist ruins in the subcontinent and the challenges British epistemologies posed to prevailing Indian memories of these spaces; Indian educators and the place of Buddhism in colonial education systems; Buddhism’s public life among new religious movements and literary publics; and the roles that Indians played in the development of global networks and new pilgrimage circuits. The last four chapters (c. 1910 – 1956) turn to Buddhism’s influence among the Hindu right and Indian National Congress; the radical non-Brahmin and Buddhist conversion movements of marginalized communities; the fusion of Buddhist and socialist ideologies in the interwar period; and the dominant public role that the independent Indian state gave to Buddhism in its domestic and foreign policies. The originality of the work rests in its understanding of Buddhism not just as an institutionalized practice and system of thought but as an imagined and inventive ‘place-world’ capable of transforming the very here and now.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it