Two sodium pumps in the hepatopancreas of the intertidal euryhaline crab <i>Neohelice</i> <i>granulata</i>: biochemical characteristics and differential modulation after feeding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No study has been done on the existence, biochemical characteristics, and modulation of K+-independent ouabain-insensitive Na+ ATPase activity (the second sodium pump) in the digestive tract of intertidal euryhaline crabs and moreover on the coexistence and modulation under distinct physiological and (or) environmental conditions of different sodium pumps. We determined the occurrence, characteristics, and responses at different times (0, 1, 24, 48, and 120 h) after feeding upon distinct salinities of Na+ ATPase activity and Na+/K+ ATPase in the hepatopancreas of Neohelice granulata (Dana, 1851), which is a model species. The stimulation by Na+ under total inhibition of Na+/K+ ATPase activity revealed the occurrence of Na+ ATPase activity that was totally inhibited by 2 mmol·L–1 furosemide, exhibits Michaelis–Menten kinetics for ATP (apparent Km = 0.52 ± 0.16 mmol·L–1), and highest activity at around pH 7.4. In crabs acclimated to 35 psu (osmoconforming conditions), Na+ ATPase activity was highly increased (about 15-fold) (532 ± 58 nmol Pi·mg protein−1·min−1) in the hepatopancreas 48 h after feeding. In 10 psu (hyper-regulating conditions), Na+ ATPase activity decreased in the hepatopancreas 24 h after feeding (7 ± 9 nmol Pi·mg protein−1·min−1) and recovered initial values after 48 h (24 ± 35 nmol Pi·mg protein−1·min−1). Unlike Na+ ATPase, Na+/K+ ATPase activity did not change after feeding at any salinity, suggesting the specific modulation of the second sodium pump and its role in postprandial adjustments in the hepatopancreas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".