Some Physical Properties of Ethylene Carbonate-Free Electrolytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physical properties of LiPF 6 in ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) electrolytes were studied by conductivity measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and differential thermal analysis (DTA). Conductivity measurements show that the addition of additive levels of FEC to EMC electrolyte can dramatically increase the conductivity of EC-free EMC electrolytes at low salt concentrations below 0.4 M. FT-IR results show that the added FEC hinders ion pair formation by competing with EMC to dissociate LiPF 6 resulting in increased conductivity in EMC electrolytes. Conductivity measurements show that the conductivity of DMC electrolytes decreases significantly below 0°C due to the high melting point of DMC. Differential thermal analysis was used to determine the LiPF 6 -DMC phase diagram which then can be used to explain the conductivity results. The results presented here identify avenues by which EC-free electrolytes can be improved for use in practical Li-ion cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".