MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782226176

DEVELOPMENT OF A FIELD-BASED MOBILE PLATFORM FOR PLANT PHENOTYPING

2018· dissertation· en· W2782226176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mostafa Bayati

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Data scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design, implementation and performance verification of an affordable field-based high-throughput plant phenotyping platform for monitoring Canola plants, including both data acquisition/visualization software and measurement system, was the main objective of this research.\nThe primary motivation for this research is the fact that breeders need a well-organized approach and efficient tool to monitor and analyze a number of plant traits to achieve a higher yield. At the moment, manual measurement is a conventional approach to gather the required information for plant analysis. Nevertheless, manual measurement has many limitations especially to study a large-scale field. To address this bottleneck, a high-throughput plant phenotyping platform (HTPP) was developed which consists of a data acquisition system, a data storage unit, and a data visualization and analysis software. Such an HTPP will be an essential asset for breeders to conveniently gather a comprehensive database which contains various information such as a plant height, temperature, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), etc.\nTo develop and implement such an HTPP, first, the overall system block diagram and required algorithms were drawn. Then to find the optimum set of equipment according to the requirement of this application, the performance of different sensors and devices were examined using literature search and experimental examinations in the laboratory setting. Then a mechanical boom was attached to the rear of a farm vehicle (a Swather) to carry different sensors, cameras and other measurement equipment (mechanical development of the boom structure was carried out by other members of the research team). \nA control box containing power supplies, safety fuses, and a data logger unit was attached to the farm vehicle, and a program was developed for data logger to read sensors signals as well as GPS data for data geo-referencing and future retrieval purposes. The efficiency of different system architecture including different data transmission networks was examined by conducting several field tests to minimize existing errors such as delays in synchronizing different steps. Three programs were developed in MATLAB GUI for image acquisition via webcam and DSLR cameras as well as a central program for data processing and interactive data visualization.\nThe indoor tests were performed at the Robotics laboratory, University of Saskatchewan and outdoor experiments were performed on a Canola nursery at Cargill Canada, Aberdeen, SK, throughout spring-summer 2016 and 2017. \nFinally, the performance and effectiveness of the developed field-based phenotyping platform was validated by various measures such as conducting some manual measurements and comparing the results with the values given by the platform. According to the achieved results, both hardware and software components of the proposed system meet the requirements of a field-based plant phenotyping platform as an essential asset for breeders for comprehensive study of Canola plants or any other cultivars as a result of some minor design modifications. \nThe main contributions of this study to plant phenotyping research are autonomous image acquisition capability, enhancement of the data acquisition cycle to minimize data geo-referencing error, development of a modular program for data visualization in MATLAB, and faster data collection in a high-throughput fashion (almost 125 times faster).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207