<i>La Vie culturelle à Montréal vers 1900</i>, Micheline Cambron, dir.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A la fois destiné au chercheur universitaire et au public intéressé par I'histoire de la culture québicoise, le collectif La Vie culturelle & Montre'al vers ~poo propose un tour d'horizon des différentes sphères représentatives de la culture à Montréal au tournant du XXe siècle.Réalisé en collaboration avec la Bibliothèque nationale du Québec -depuis peu Bibliothèque et archives nationales du Québec -il réunit les textes de dix-neuf collaborateurs spécialistes de littérature, de musique, d'histoire de l'art et d'histoire des institutions qui ont participé à un colloque sur le sujet.11 comporte par ailleurs de nombreuses illustrations et est accompagné d'un CD qui regroupe une vingtaine de documents sonores liés à l'époque commentée, notamment des ceuvres inspirées par les poètes de l'icole littéraire de Montrial.Divisé en trois parties respectivement intitulées < >, < > et < >, f'ouvrage se veut clairement interdisciplinaire, et en ce sens, if s'inscrit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".