MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782262132 · doi:10.4000/rdlc.2628

Enseignements universitaires francophones en milieux bi / plurilingues : légitimations et mises en œuvre

2013· article· fr· W2782262132 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle Omer, Frédéric Tupin

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en didactique des langues et des cultures · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le dossier thématique de ce numéro, issu des travaux de l’axe Éducation et Plurilinguismes : mises en perspective historiques et sociales du projet régional Pluri-L1 de la région des Pays de la Loire, est consacré à diverses légitimations et mises en œuvre d’enseignements universitaires francophones en milieux bi / plurilingues. À ce titre, nous souhaitons apporter des éclairages variés, tenant compte du statut des langues en présence, au sujet du développement d’une compétence bi / plurilingue à l’université, que ce soit du point de vue des acteurs concernés, des dispositifs conçus ou des difficultés rencontrées au moment de la réalisation. Une partie varia comprend deux études qui concernent l’une le niveau primaire et l’autre le niveau secondaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches en didactique des langues et des culturesSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207