MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W27822636 · doi:10.1007/s10787-016-0295-y

Toward Distributed, Pluggable Tools and Data: Re-Engineering a Data Analysis Architecture

2003· article· en· W27822636 on OpenAlex
J. Scott Hawker, Keith E. Massey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammopharmacology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceVisualizationPlug-inSoftware engineeringData visualizationData architectureData scienceComputer architectureReference architectureSoftware architectureData miningProgramming languageSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An existing system for data analysis and visualization had the need to evolve to accommodate new analysis techniques and new application domains. However, its architecture was a significant barrier to realizing this need. We performed an architectural analysis of the system, which led us to re-engineer the system to use an architecture based on components and frameworks. What results is an architecture that supports plugins for new data analysis tools, new visualization techniques, and new data types and sources. This paper presents and evaluates the initial and the re-engineered architecture. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it