Protective Environment for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HSCT) Recipients: The Infectious Diseases Working Party EBMT Analysis of Global Recommendations on Health-Care Facilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: An international global perspective for guidelines for health-care facilities in which HSCT recipients are treated was announced in 2009 by Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, and Centers for Disease Control. With respect to guidelines on hospital room design and ventilation for HSCT setting, a set of 10 recommendations were presented (Tomblyn et al, 2009). OBJECTIVE: Since the issue is clearly of practical importance to world-wide transplant community, the IDWP-EBMT created a survey in order to present the current status on protective environment for recipients of HSCT, and to analyze the trends and needs in hospital transplant room design and ventilation. METHODS: The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions in all and was divided into 6 sections that included the contact information and details of the protective isolation facility including air filtration, air changes, maintenance, combination of isolation, protective environment room/unit and floor. RESULTS: In all, 177 centres from 36 countries responded to the survey, with average 33% country response rate. Physicians completed 62%, nurses 19% and support staff 19% of the surveys. A total number of 71% of answers were provided to all questions. The total number of unanswered questions was lowest among physicians (23% vs 49%; p CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about the maintenance of protective environments in the HSCT setting was inadequate, reflecting a lacking information between health personnel working in the ward and hospital offices. Only 6 centers were able to meet all 10 recommendations listed by Tomblyn et al and few centers were able to meet all the relevant technical requirements. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".