KEPASTIAN HUKUM TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI TELEPON SELULER MELALUI MEDIA ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA - LEGAL SECURITY ON CELLPHONE TRADING THROUGH ELECTRONIC MEDIA IN INDONESIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
POSTPRINTArtikel ini telah terbit dan dipublikasikan oleh Jurnal Dinamika Hukum http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/800DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.2.800cara sitasi/kutip:Aswari, Aan, et al. "LEGAL SECURITY ON CELLPHONE TRADING THROUGH ELECTRONIC MEDIA IN INDONESIA." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 17.2 (2017): 181-187.AbstrakPerkembangan teknologi yang semakin meningkat berakibat pada segi kehidupan manusia dalam pemanfaatannya. Artikel ini mengkaji kepastian hukum melalui beberapa komponen dalam sebuah transaksi jual beli telepon seluler melalui media elektronik. Kajian ini merupakan gagasan konseptual dan menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan kepastian hukum dalam beberapa komponen seharusnya dapat memberikan solusi terhadap konflik yang dapat timbul dikemudian hari. Komponen itikad baik harus sebagai pembentuk hubungan hukum yang ideal dari awal hingga berakhir, dan realisasi dalam melaksanakan kewajiban merupakan gambaran konkritnya. Komponen garansi memberikan jaminan perlindungan bagi para pihak, dan berbagai regulasi mengatur perbuatan hukum dalam bertransaksi, namun masih berserakan diberbagai komponen pendukung lain yang berupaya pemanfaatan teknologi dalam bertransaksi dapat berkesinambungan.The rapid growth of technology development brings impact on human live related to its utilization. This article analyzes legal security through several components in a cellphone trading through electronic media. This study is a conceptual idea and shows that the implementation of legal security in several components should provide, solution to any potential conflicts. A good intention component should be applied to form an ideal legal relation from the beginning tho the end and realization in performing its obligation reflect the concrete aspect. Warranty provides protection security for related parties with some governing regulations during trasaction. However, some other supporting components have not been efectively contribute to balance the utilization of tecnology in trading.BIBLIOGRAPHYAlfian Perdana, dkk, Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Media Elektronik, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.2.No.1.2014, Banda Aceh: Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala.Corbitt, Brian J., Theerasak Thanasankit, and Han Yi. “Trust and E-Commerce: A Study of Consumer Perceptions.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Vol.2 No.3, 2003, Elsevier.Faisal, Faisal. 2010. “Menggugat Dominasi Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol. 4, No.1, 2010, Bangka Belitung, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bangka Belitung.Kumar, Satinder and Rishi Sharma. 2014. “An Empirical Analysis of Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail.” Paradigm Vol.18 No.1, 2014, SAGE Publications.Mahadevan B. Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy. California Management Review, Vol.42 No.4, 2000, California: University of California Press JournalMarotta-Wurglerf, Florencia. “Will Increased Disclosure Help ? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI’s ‘Principles of the Law of Software Contracts.’” JSTOR, Vol.78. No.1, 2011. The University of Chicago Law Review.Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, Peranan Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Transaksi Elektronik di Peradilan Umum, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.11, No.2. 2011, Puwokerto: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jenderal Soerdiman.Rochani Urip Salami dan Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Transaksi Eletronik (E-Commerce), Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.13, No.2. 2013, Puwokerto: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jenderal SoerdimanSyaibatul Hamidi, dkk, Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Pidana, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.1, No.4, 2013, Banda Aceh: Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala.Syaifullah Noor, dkk, Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Dikaitkan Dengan kebebasan Berekspresi, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.3, No.3, 2015, Banda Aceh: Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala.Wijayanta, Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Keputusan Kepailitan Niaga, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.14, No.2. 2014, Puwokerto: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jenderal Soerdiman.Zakaria, etc. “Moral Philosophies Underlying Ethical Judgments.” International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol.4 No.2, 2012, Canadian Center of Science and Education.Alfons Tanujaya, 18th of April 2013, “Catat ! Ini Daftar Toko Online Abal-Abal” available on the website: https://inet.detik.com/security/d-2223902/catat-ini-daftar-toko-online-abal-abal , acessed on August 10th, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".