MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782335862 · doi:10.1080/07362990500397319

On Complete Convergence in Mean of Normed Sums of Independent Random Elements in Banach Spaces

2006· article· en· W2782335862 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Rosalsky, Lê Vǎn Thành, Andrei Volodin

Bibliographic record

VenueStochastic Analysis and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBanach spaceSeparable spaceSequence (biology)Order (exchange)Type (biology)CombinatoricsConvergence (economics)Random variableWeak convergenceCharacterization (materials science)Discrete mathematicsMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a sequence of random elements {T n , n ≥ 1} in a real separable Banach space 𝒳, we study the notion of T n converging completely to 0 in mean of order p where p is a positive constant. This notion is stronger than (i) T n converging completely to 0 and (ii) T n converging to 0 in mean of order p. When 𝒳 is of Rademacher type p (1 ≤ p ≤ 2), for a sequence of independent mean 0 random elements {V n , n ≥ 1} in 𝒳 and a sequence of constants b n → ∞, conditions are provided under which the normed sum converges completely to 0 in mean of order p. Moreover, these conditions for converging completely to 0 in mean of order p are shown to provide an exact characterization of Rademacher type p Banach spaces. Illustrative examples are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStochastic Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207