MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782434757 · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.367

Development of a Mobile Tele-Simulation Unit Prototype for Training of Rural and Remote Emergency Health Care Providers

2018· article· en· W2782434757 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Jewer, Adam Dubrowski, Kristopher Hoover, Andrew Smith, Michael H. Parsons

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnit (ring theory)Multidisciplinary approachComputer scienceTelemedicineHealth careTraining (meteorology)Process managementEngineering managementKnowledge managementBusinessEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emergency health care providers in rural and remote areas do not have the same access to training as those in urban areas. This poses a serious challenge to the provision of equitable healthcare delivery. This paper outlines the development of a Mobile Tele-Simulation Unit (MTU) prototype to address the challenges of training in rural and remote settings. The goal of the MTU is to increase opportunities for emergency health care providers to attain training remotely. Mobile tele-simulation is a new approach to remote medical training with many clear benefits however one must understand how to develop such a unit and its effectiveness in teaching procedural skills. In this paper, we describe our multidisciplinary mixed-methods approach to develop the MTU using proven theoretical frameworks. We also discuss the developmental challenges, findings on trainee satisfaction and learning outcomes. Initial results are promising and warrant a formal evaluation stage to complete our study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesSame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207