ORIENTASI PEMIKIRAN ULAMA’ NU (Jender dalam Perspektif Ulama Skriptualis dan Subtansialis di NU Cabang Sumenep)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semenjak akhir abad ke 18 atau awal abad ke -19 Masehi telahtumbuh perjumpaan intensif antara dunia Islam dan duniaBarat. Pada periode ini, kaum Muslim harus menghadapipilihan yang sangat dilematis, antara keinginan untukmenjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai ajaran Islam dengan kebutuhanmengikuti gagasan-gagasan modern. Ini kemudianmelahirkan corak pemikiran skriptualis dan substansialis.Melalui topik jender, kedua corak pemikiran ini juga terjadi dikalangan ulama’ NU Cabang Sumenep. Secara ideologis,keduanya berbeda karena metode pemaknaan merekaterhadap teks ajaran Islam juga berbeda. Sedangkan secarasosiologis, keduanya berbeda dalam memandang fenomenasosial yang berkembang. Dalam hal jender, ulama’ skriptualisberpegang teguh kepada ketidakbolehan perempuan menjadipemimpin berdasarkan atas ayat al-Qur’ân dan Hadîts.Sedangkan kalangan ulama’ substansialis meneguhkankebolehan perempuan untuk memegang jabatan publik. Inididasarkan atas pemaknaan substansial terhadap al-Qur’ânsurat al-Nisâ’: 34 dan hadîts Nabi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".