Local structure investigation of Ga and Yb dopants in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Co</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sb</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> skutterudites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report comprehensive x-ray absorption spectroscopy studies at both the Ga $K$ edge and Yb ${L}_{2}$ edge to elucidate the local structure of Ga and Yb dopants in ${\mathrm{Yb}}_{x}{\mathrm{Ga}}_{y}{\mathrm{Co}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$. Our extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data confirm that Ga atoms occupy two crystallographic sites: one is the $24g$ site replacing Sb, and the other is the $2a$ site in the off-center void position. We find that the occupancy ratio of these two sites varies significantly as a function of the filling fraction of additional Yb, which exclusively occupies the $2a$ on-center site. At low concentrations of Yb, ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{24g}$ and ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{2a}$ dopants coexist and they form a charge-compensated compound defect proposed by Qiu et al. [Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 3194 (2013)]. The ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{24g}$ occupancy increases gradually with increasing Yb concentration, and almost all Ga occupies the $24g$ site for the highest Yb concentration studied ($x=0.4$). In addition to the local structural evidence provided by our EXAFS data, we also present x-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra, which show a small Ga $K$-edge energy shift as a function of Yb concentration consistent with the change from predominantly ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{2a}$ to ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{24g}$ states. Our result suggests that the increased solubility of Yb in Yb-Ga co-doped ${\mathrm{Co}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{12}$ skutterudites is due to the increased ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{24g}$ electron acceptor, and thus provides an important strategy to optimize the carrier concentration in partially filled skutterudites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".