MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782730446 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2017.8263644

Optimal sensor design for infinite-time Kalman filters

2017· article· en· W2782730446 on OpenAlexaff
Shu‐Xia Tang, Kirsten Morris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterEstimatorPartial differential equationComputer scienceOptimal estimationMathematical optimizationMinificationFocus (optics)Variance (accounting)Control theory (sociology)Optimal designMathematicsApplied mathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with state estimation for systems governed by partial differential equations. Kalman filters are optimal state estimators in that they minimize the estimation error variance for given measurements. The focus of this paper is the achievement of additional minimization of the error variance by also optimizing over the sensor design. The optimal sensor design problem is thus incorporated into the estimation problem. Not only the sensor location but also other factors such as sensor shape and the effect of the sensors on system dynamics are included in the optimization criteria. The problem is first stated formally, and then it is shown to be well-posed and to possess an optimal solution. Applications to a one-dimensional diffusion equation and also to a two-dimensional wave equation are given. A computational framework for calculation of optimal shape is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207