MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782730446 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2017.8263644

Optimal sensor design for infinite-time Kalman filters

2017· article· en· W2782730446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterEstimatorPartial differential equationComputer scienceOptimal estimationMathematical optimizationMinificationFocus (optics)Variance (accounting)Control theory (sociology)Optimal designMathematicsApplied mathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with state estimation for systems governed by partial differential equations. Kalman filters are optimal state estimators in that they minimize the estimation error variance for given measurements. The focus of this paper is the achievement of additional minimization of the error variance by also optimizing over the sensor design. The optimal sensor design problem is thus incorporated into the estimation problem. Not only the sensor location but also other factors such as sensor shape and the effect of the sensors on system dynamics are included in the optimization criteria. The problem is first stated formally, and then it is shown to be well-posed and to possess an optimal solution. Applications to a one-dimensional diffusion equation and also to a two-dimensional wave equation are given. A computational framework for calculation of optimal shape is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it