X-ray Absorption and Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy of Fluorinated Proton Conducting Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
19 F and 13 C solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectra and near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra at the S 2p, C 1s, O 1s, and F 1s edges of three different types of perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) proton conducting polymers are reported. The NEXAFS spectra were recorded in a scanning transmission X-ray microscope (STXM). They are reported on quantitative intensity scales, suitable for use as reference standards for analytical spectromicroscopy studies. The NEXAFS spectral features are assigned using comparisons to the corresponding spectra of small molecule and polymer analogues, including C 1s and F 1s spectra of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) recorded using STXM. The 19 F and 13 C SSNMR spectra are reported and analyzed. Within each type of spectroscopy, the spectra of the three types of PFSA are very similar. However, small but statistically significant differences were identified which give insights into how minor molecular structure differences are reflected in the SSNMR and NEXAFS spectra. The relative chemical sensitivity of SSNMR and NEXAFS for studies of PFSA materials is compared. Solution-state NMR diffusion profile analyses of two PFSA ionomer dispersions are also reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".