Premiers écrits philosophiques. Productivité conceptuelle et créativité rédactionnelle du CE2 au CM2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La qualité rédactionnelle est étudiée sur un échantillon de 167 copies d’élèves. Les élèves produisent des brouillons et des textes. À partir de variables philosophique, cognitive et linguistique, les consignes croisant trois thèmes – nature/culture, rêve et liberté – avec deux supports – œuvres d’art et magazine – sont testées. Les élèves sont aptes dès le CM1 à produire significativement des postulats, puis des exemples, et démarrent la production de raisonnements et d’hypothèses, révélant des performances philosophiques. L’évolution développementale de la conceptualisation est significative du CE2 au CM2. Mobiliser des distinctions conceptuelles, organiser son brouillon dépendent significativement de la consigne. Mobiliser la pensée divergente ou des métaphores concerne peu d’élèves. Un effet de sexe confirme la supériorité des filles. L’étude engage à varier les consignes d’écriture à l’école primaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".