MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782791092 · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0147

Mitochondrial activity in gametes and uniparental inheritance: a comment on ‘What can we infer about the origin of sex in early eukaryotes?’

2018· letter· en· W2782791092 on OpenAlexaff
Fabrizio Ghiselli, Sophie Breton, Liliana Milani

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitochondrial DNABiologyGameteNon-Mendelian inheritanceGeneticsMitochondrionSpermInheritance (genetic algorithm)Evolutionary biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In his insightful article, Speijer [1] discussed the origin of sex under multiple points of view, providing a comprehensive and balanced overview of different theories and hypotheses. However, we think that the section ‘Higher mutational loads in one gamete type and retention of uniparental mitochondrial inheritance’ (§9) needs some clarification. Speijer [1] elaborates on the correlation between gamete metabolic and physiological differences and their organellar contribution across generations. Specifically, he quotes the ‘division of labour’ hypothesis, which postulates that male gametes maximize energy production for motility by sacrificing mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and its mutagenic by-products, while non-motile female gametes repress OXPHOS, thus being somewhat inactive [2]. Basically, we clarify two discussion points: (i) the exceptions to the strictly maternal inheritance (SMI) of mitochondria and (ii) the claim that mtDNA is highly mutated in sperm and the supposed causal relationship between such damage and OXPHOS. Exceptions to SMI by which bioenergetically active mitochondria are stably inherited through generations might represent a challenge for the division of labour hypothesis. Doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) is the only known evolutionarily stable exception to the SMI typical of Metazoa. In DUI animals (approx. 100 species of gonochoric bivalve molluscs identified so far [3]), two mitochondrial lineages are inherited, one through eggs (F-type) and the other through sperm (M-type). Eggs are homoplasmic for the F-type, while spermatozoa are homoplasmic for the M-type. These ‘mother-to-daughter’ and ‘father-to-son’ mitochondrial lineages have evolved independently for millions of years (e.g. more than 200 Myr in unionids), accumulating up to 40% of DNA sequence divergence. Since eggs do not transmit the M-type, germ line mitochondria of DUI males are apportioned from the four/five mitochondria of the fertilizing spermatozoon, which carry mtDNA that must be functional and successfully inherited [ …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.028
Scholarly communication0.0040.016
Open science0.0110.004
Research integrity0.0400.059
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207