MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782846006 · doi:10.1063/1.5024385

Eventually entanglement breaking maps

2018· article· en· W2782846006 on OpenAlexafffund
Mizanur Rahaman, Samuel Jaques, Vern I. Paulsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantum entanglementMathematicsTensor productConjectureSeparable stateIterated functionSeparable spaceMatrix (chemical analysis)Class (philosophy)TransposePure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisQuantumComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsPhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze linear maps on matrix algebras that become entanglement breaking after composing a finite or infinite number of times with themselves. This means that the Choi matrix of the iterated linear map becomes separable in the tensor product space. If a linear map becomes entanglement breaking after finitely many iterations, we say that the map has a finite index of separability. In particular, we show that every unital positive partial transpose (PPT) channel has a finite index of separability and that the class of unital channels that have a finite index of separability is a dense subset of the unital channels. We construct concrete examples of maps which are not PPT but have a finite index of separability. We prove that there is a large class of unital channels that are asymptotically entanglement breaking. Our work is motivated by Christandl’s PPT-squared conjecture. This conjecture states that every PPT channel, when composed with itself, becomes entanglement breaking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207