MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782932333 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2017.77

Plan-view Paleochannel Reconstruction of Amalgamated Meander Belts, Cretaceous Ferron Sandstone, Notom Delta, South-central Utah, U.s.a.

2017· article· en· W2782932333 on OpenAlexaff
Jianqiao Wang, Janok P. Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary rockCretaceousPaleontologyPalaeochannelArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Few studies reconstruct paleohydraulic parameters, such as meander amplitude and sinuosity, of ancient rivers based on plan-view outcrop exposures, but rather rely on interpolation from cliff exposures. In this study, extensive plan-view exposures of amalgamated ancient meander belts in the Cretaceous Ferron Sandstone Member of the Mancos Shale Formation, Utah, USA, allow paleohydraulic reconstruction, evaluation of grain-size variability in meander belts, and their component unit and compound bars by incorporating the variability of paleocurrents, facies architectural-element analysis, and bar migration patterns. Three channel belts were identified, marked by scour surfaces, an increase in grain size, and abrupt changes in paleocurrent orientations. The youngest channel was about 2.1 m deep and 118 m wide, and had a meander wavelength of 1 km and a sinuosity of 1.1–2.9. The middle channel was about 3.4 m deep, with a meander wavelength of 2.6 km, and a sinuosity of 1.2. The oldest channel was insufficiently exposed to document its plan-view style. Grain-size trends showed systematic upwards fining in each channel story. In plan view, coarsening occurs towards the bend apex along the bend axis, and fining occurs downstream within some meander scrolls. Plan-form grain-size trends were not obvious, partially due to grain-size variation within unit bars, perhaps also reflecting the fact that the exposures capture variable vertical position in each channel belt. Paleocurrents showed systematically varying trends within individual channel belts (from NE, to SW, to E), and abrupt changes between belts. Grain size and vertical facies associations vary as a function of the style of bar migration, as well as position within a bar (upstream vs. downstream). The outcrop shows a dominance of a meandering-river style, with significant lateral amalgamation of successive point bars within each belt. Compound braid bars, built by overlapping unit bars, constitute the youngest channel deposits, and are probably associated with channel abandonment. Independent measurements of meander wavelength, based on plan-view exposures, match results estimated from empirical equations. The Ferron rivers are small to medium in scale according to calculated paleohydraulic parameters (Qw = 1.6 ∼ 2.8 × 102 m3/s). Architectural-element analysis shows that the last stage, and the most sinuous channel belt (A1), filled largely with downstream accreting unit and compound braid bars, similar to those seen in high-sinuosity meander loops of the modern Red River at the Texas–Oklahoma border. This suggests that both braid bars and point bars may occur within a single meander channel and that braid bars may evolve into compound point bars as they migrate and attach to a channel margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207