MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782939756 · doi:10.1115/imece2017-70767

Statistical Linearization of Nonlinear Stiffness Matrix of Planetary Gear Train

2017· article· en· W2782939756 on OpenAlexaff
Jalal Taheri Kahnamouei, Jianming Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemBacklashStiffnessLinearizationControl theory (sociology)Direct stiffness methodVibrationStiffness matrixRandom vibrationGear trainRestoring forceTime domainMatrix (chemical analysis)MathematicsEngineeringMathematical analysisComputer scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsAcousticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic dynamic analysis of the planetary gear train is complicated and it becomes more challenging when the nonlinear term is considered in the equation. A backlash between gears’ teeth is one of the nonlinearity sources in the gearbox which changes the equation of random vibration to nonlinear. In this paper, the linearization of the random vibration of multi-degrees of freedom (MDOF) with nonlinear stiffness is examined for planetary gear trains. The method used to treat nonlinearity is the statistical linearization method (SL). At first, to achieve adequate accuracy, the time domain is divided into very small time intervals then SL is utilized in each time step. For each time step an equivalent linear stiffness matrix is calculated and replacs the nonlinear stiffness matrix. The comparison between equivalent stiffness and linear stiffness at each step has shown a good agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207