MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2782980506 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty654

The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: anisotropic Baryon Acoustic Oscillations measurements in Fourier-space with optimal redshift weights

2018· article· en· W2782980506 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dandan Wang, Gong‐Bo Zhao, Yuting Wang, Will J. Percival, Rossana Ruggeri, Fangzhou Zhu, Rita Tojeiro, Adam D. Myers, Chia-Hsun Chuang, Falk Baumgarten, Cheng Zhao, Héctor Gil-Marín, Ashley J. Ross, E. Burtin, Pauline Zarrouk, Julian Bautista, J. Brinkmann, Kyle Dawson, Joel R. Brownstein, Axel de la Macorra, Donald P. Schneider, Arman Shafieloo

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieChinese Academy of SciencesU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaYork UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityPrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityNational Science FoundationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsPhysicsBaryon acoustic oscillationsRedshiftQuasarAstrophysicsBaryonOscillation (cell signaling)Redshift-space distortionsAnisotropyIsotropyRedshift surveyGalaxyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a measurement of the anisotropic and isotropic Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 14 quasar sample with optimal redshift weights. Applying the redshift weights improves the constraint on the BAO dilation parameter α(zeff) by 17 per cent. We reconstruct the evolution history of the BAO distance indicators in the redshift range of 0.8 < z < 2.2. This paper is part of a set that analyses the eBOSS DR14 quasar sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→