Bibliographic record
Abstract
Projet collaboratif et interdisciplinaire runissant une quinzaine de spcialistes de la francophonie de l'Universit d'Ottawa, le Chantier Ottawa 1 cherche faire l'histoire de la Ville d'Ottawa du point de vue des francophones qui ont particip son dification. Il se structure autour de diffrentes initiatives de recherche sur la population francophone : ses quartiers, ses institutions, ses ralisations, sa participation politique. Il s'intresse particulirement aux annes 1960 et 1970, moment de grandes transformations au sein de la communaut francophone d'Ottawa. L'une des ambitions du Chantier est de faire une histoire orale d'Ottawa, lieu de vie franaise, en ayant recours aux mmoires de ses citoyens 2 . Notre objectif est de reconstruire, partir des rcits du pass livrs par 1 Pour en connatre plus sur le Chantier Ottawa, voir
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".