MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782985982 · doi:10.1109/icmla.2017.0-166

Anytime Exploitation of Stragglers in Synchronous Stochastic Gradient Descent

2017· article· en· W2782985982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDescent (aeronautics)Stochastic gradient descentArtificial intelligenceEngineeringAerospace engineeringArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose an approach to parallelizing synchronous stochastic gradient descent (SGD) that we term “Anytime-Gradients”. The Anytime-Gradients is designed to exploit the work completed by slow compute nodes or “stragglers”. In many approaches work completed by these nodes, while only partial, is discarded completely. To maintain synchronization in our approach, each computational epoch is of fixed duration, and at the end of each epoch, workers send updated parameter vectors to a master mode for combination. The master weights each update by the amount of work done. The Anytime-Gradients scheme is robust to both persistent and non-persistent stragglers and requires no prior knowledge about processor abilities. We show that the scheme effectively exploits stragglers and outperforms existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it