SAÚDE E DESENVOLVIMENTO NO BRASIL: ARGUMENTOS PARA PROMOVER A CIDADANIA EM TEMPOS DIFÍCEIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O Brasil enfrenta uma crise economica das mais profundas e duradouras de sua historia recente, com efeitos negativos sobre o mercado de trabalho, a renda familiar e a mobilidade social. As medidas de austeridade fiscal implementadas pelo governo apresentam resultados igualmente negativos sobre a situacao de saude da populacao e o sistema de saude. Diante desse cenario, como o Sistema Unico de Saude (SUS) poderia contribuir para mitigar os efeitos da recessao da economia brasileira sobre as classes populares e medias? Oferecer respostas a essa pergunta e o objetivo do presente artigo, que traz elementos que ajudam a compreender a correlacao entre saude e desenvolvimento, os efeitos das mudancas em curso sobre a atuacao do Estado na area social e em que medida o SUS pode ser utilizado como instrumento anticiclico para atenuar os efeitos da crise economica. Argumenta-se que existe um reforco mutuo entre saude e desenvolvimento que pode ensejar um circulo virtuoso no qual a expansao do SUS possibilita mais saude, mais crescimento economico e mais igualdade social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".