MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783053206 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23130

<i>n</i>‐butane partial oxidation in a fixed bed: A resolved particle computational fluid dynamics simulation

2018· article· en· W2783053206 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Behnam Partopour, Anthony G. Dixon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
KeywordsPartial oxidationExothermic reactionMaleic anhydrideButaneSelectivityCatalysisParticle (ecology)ChemistryOxygenParticle sizeWettingCombustionMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Maleic anhydride (MA) is an important chemical intermediate, which is mainly produced by the highly exothermic partial oxidation of n‐butane in fixed bed reactors. Production of maleic anhydride is limited by problems of temperature control and loss of selectivity. Here we present three‐dimensional resolved‐particle computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of n‐butane partial oxidation in a randomly packed bed of 807 spherical catalyst particles. We used a semi‐empirical two‐site surface mechanism from the literature and obtained distributions of temperature, gas phase species, and surface species in the bed. The local selectivity patterns are strongly controlled by the changes in the gas phase flow field, the temperature in the fixed bed, and the weakly adsorbed oxygen surface coverage fraction (λO) profiles inside the particles. Most of the selectivity loss due to product combustion happens in the interior of the catalyst particles, as opposed to the production of MA, which is mainly in the near‐surface layers. We observed loss of selectivity and yield in the centre of the bed at increased bed depths, because of the temperature increase and decrease in gas phase oxygen there. The simulations show sharp λO gradients inside the particles. Near the cooled tube wall λO is strongly affected by the temperature, while at the bed centre gas phase oxygen diffusion limitations contribute to a depleted oxygen surface resulting in lower selectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207