MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783059020 · doi:10.4000/marges.1353

« Métropole  : experiência paulistana »

2017· article· fr· W2783059020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcos Pedro Magalhães Rosa, Marina Silva e Siqueira

Bibliographic record

VenueMarges · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisHumanitiesArtPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le mythe du bandeirante a eu un rôle central dans la construction identitaire brésilienne au début du 20e siècle, quand la ville de São Paulo a pris la tête de l’économie nationale. Les bandeirantes, des métis d’indigènes et d’Européens, sont normalement décrits comme des expéditionnaires qui à partir de São Paulo se sont lancés dans la forêt vierge. Asservissant les indigènes et découvrant des mines d’or, ils auraient fixé les frontières du pays. L’exposition « Métropole : l’expérience pau...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMargesSame topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207