MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783066278 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v7n2p1

The Transmuted Weibull Regression Model: an Application to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Data

2018· article· en· W2783066278 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsWeibull distributionStatisticsGlycated hemoglobinEstimatorProportional hazards modelCovariateLogistic regressionType 2 Diabetes MellitusMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we are considering the transmuted Weibull distribution to investigate the role of oxidative stress markers as indicators of risk of injury of the lower extremities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A group of patients was studied until medical discharge assessing the following variables: glycated hemoglobin and three blood markers of oxidative status. In face of explicative covariates, we are considering the regression approach of the transmuted model to fit this real dataset. The inference was considere by using the method of maximum likelihood and the consistency of the estimators were verified by a Monte Carlo simulation study presented in this manuscript. Some properties as the moment generation function, median and the behaviors of the hazard and survival functions, are also included in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it