Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors qu’on associe les Basques du XVIe-XVIIIe siècle surtout à la pêche à la morue et la chasse aux baleines, les archives en langue espagnole révèlent aussi l’existence de la chasse au phoque au Labrador durant la période de 1603 à 1661. Menée par les marins des ports de Mutriku et Deba, la chasse au phoque est connue particulièrement à travers la carrière d’Antonio de Iturribalzaga. Ce capitaine organisait les voyages de chasse au phoque au Labrador, et vendait des peaux de phoque à des tanneurs et cordonniers du Pays basque. Le commerce du phoque permet de voir des liens avec d’autres industries, comme celle des tanneries et de l’exportation des peaux traitées jusqu’au Portugal. Il forme aussi un contexte historique pour la tradition orale qui existe au Pays basque sur les relations entre les Basques et les Inuit, et il constitue un précurseur de la chasse au phoque sédentaire en Nouvelle-France aux XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".