MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biblioteca universitária, um ambiente sistêmico propício ao acesso, ao uso e à apropriação da informação: contribuições da web social para esse ambiente

2018· article· pt· W2783158117 on OpenAlex
Makson de Jesus Reis, Raquel Rosário Santos, Emeide Nóbrega Duarte

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação e Biblioteconomia · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo registra uma reflexão sobre a biblioteca universitária, enquanto ambiente sistêmico, que potencializa, por meio de suas atividades de mediação, o acesso, o uso e a apropriação da informação. É discutido o processo de utilização dos dispositivos de comunicação na web social, a fim de proporcionar a criação de novos conhecimentos pelos usuários da informação. Nessa perspectiva, objetiva-se com este artigo de aporte teórico, contextualizar as contribuições dos dispositivos de comunicação da web social no desenvolvimento das atividades para construção de conhecimento no ambiente da biblioteca universitária.Palavras-chave: Biblioteca Universitária. Bibliotecários. Dispositivos de comunicação da web social.Link: https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/546

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0190.032
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.015
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it